Wednesday, December 26, 2007

HUD Demolition in New Orleans

The New Orleans, LA low income housing demolitions: ONE OF 'GREATEST CRIMES IN U.S. URBAN PLANNING'
HUD's arguments for the demolition of thousands of public housing units in New Orleans echoes the worst of the "tabula rasa" approach to urban renewal of the 1960s, writes Nicolai Ouroussoff in the Dec 21 2007 New York Times. To view the full article, CLICK HERE.

Sunday, December 23, 2007

New Tent City in LA

    Tent City in Suburbs Is Cost of Home Crisis
    By Dana Ford  Reuters  Thursday 20 December 2007

    Between railroad tracks and beneath the roar of departing planes sits "tent city," a terminus for homeless people. It is not, as might be expected, in a blighted city center, but in the once-booming suburbia of Southern California.

    The noisy, dusty camp sprang up in July with 20 residents and now numbers 200 people, including several children, growing as this region east of Los Angeles has been hit by the U.S. housing crisis.

    The unraveling of the region known as the Inland Empire reads like a 21st century version of "The Grapes of Wrath," John Steinbeck's novel about families driven from their lands by the Great Depression.

    As more families throw in the towel and head to foreclosure here and across the nation, the social costs of collapse are adding up in the form of higher rates of homelessness, crime and even disease.

    While no current residents claim to be victims of foreclosure, all agree that tent city is a symptom of the wider economic downturn. And it's just a matter of time before foreclosed families end up at tent city, local housing experts say.

    "They don't hit the streets immediately," said activist Jane Mercer. Most families can find transitional housing in a motel or with friends before turning to charity or the streets. "They only hit tent city when they really bottom out."

    Steve, 50, who declined to give his last name, moved to tent city four months ago. He gets social security payments, but cannot work and said rents are too high.

    "House prices are going down, but the rentals are sky-high," said Steve. "If it wasn't for here, I wouldn't have a place to go."

    "Squatting in Vacant Houses"

    Nationally, foreclosures are at an all-time high. Filings are up nearly 100 percent from a year ago, according to the data firm RealtyTrac. Officials say that as many as half a million people could lose their homes as adjustable mortgage rates rise over the next two years.

    California ranks second in the nation for foreclosure filings - one per 88 households last quarter. Within California, San Bernardino county in the Inland Empire is worse - one filing for every 43 households, according to RealtyTrac.

    Maryanne Hernandez bought her dream house in San Bernardino in 2003 and now risks losing it after falling four months behind on mortgage payments.

    "It's not just us. It's all over," said Hernandez, who lives in a neighborhood where most families are struggling to meet payments and many have lost their homes.

    She has noticed an increase in crime since the foreclosures started. Her house was robbed, her kids' bikes were stolen and she worries about what type of message empty houses send.

    The pattern is cropping up in communities across the country, like Cleveland, Ohio, where Mark Wiseman, director of the Cuyahoga County Foreclosure Prevention Program, said there are entire blocks of homes in Cleveland where 60 or 70 percent of houses are boarded up.

    "I don't think there are enough police to go after criminals holed up in those houses, squatting or doing drug deals or whatever," Wiseman said.

    "And it's not just a problem of a neighborhood filled with people squatting in the vacant houses, it's the people left behind, who have to worry about people taking siding off your home or breaking into your house while you're sleeping."

    Health risks are also on the rise. All those empty swimming pools in California's Inland Empire have become breeding grounds for mosquitoes, which can transmit the sometimes deadly West Nile virus, Riverside County officials say.

    "Trickle-Down Effect"

    But it is not just homeowners who are hit by the foreclosure wave. People who rent now find themselves in a tighter, more expensive market as demand rises from families who lost homes, said Jean Beil, senior vice president for programs and services at Catholic Charities USA.

    "Folks who would have been in a house before are now in an apartment and folks that would have been in an apartment, now can't afford it," said Beil. "It has a trickle-down effect."

    For cities, foreclosures can trigger a range of short-term costs, like added policing, inspection and code enforcement. These expenses can be significant, said Lt. Scott Patterson with the San Bernardino Police Department, but the larger concern is that vacant properties lower home values and in the long-run, decrease tax revenues.

    And it all comes at a time when municipalities are ill-equipped to respond. High foreclosure rates and declining home values are sapping property tax revenues, a key source of local funding to tackle such problems.

    Earlier this month, U.S. President George W. Bush rolled out a plan to slow foreclosures by freezing the interest rates on some loans. But for many in these parts, the intervention is too little and too late.

    Ken Sawa, CEO of Catholic Charities in San Bernardino and Riverside counties, said his organization is overwhelmed and ill-equipped to handle the volume of people seeking help.

    "We feel helpless," said Sawa. "Obviously, it's a local problem because it's in our backyard, but the solution is not local."

  -------




Monday, December 3, 2007

Housing Element Updates

All jurisdictions in the San Francisco Bay Area (and parts of the rest of the state) are gearing up to revise the housing elements of their general plans for the upcoming 5-year planning period. All cities and counties have these general plan housing elements, and there are a whole range of state requirements which the plans must meet. They have to identify specific sites where multi-family housing can be built by right; they have to address special housing needs of seniors, farmworkers, homeless persons and persons with disabilities; and they have to set out programs to facilitate development of affordable housing. The housing element gets reviewed by a state agency - the Department of Housing and Community Development - to determine if it complies with state mandates. Persons and groups interested in promoting more affordable housing in their areas should consider getting involved in the housing element update process. It can make a huge difference in whether any affordable housing will be built. Contact the person in charge of your local planning departments. Ask to be put on mailing lists and e-mail lists to get notice of local public hearings on the housing element update. Consider sending a letter to your local planning department urging them to adopt programs such as inclusionary zoning ordinances, commercial linkage fees, reasonable accommodation ordinances, and other programs to meet the jurisdiction's need for various kinds of affordable housing. CLICK HERE to see a letter that HAG recently sent to the City of Santa Rosa about its housing element update process.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Grey Panthers on Affordable Housing

Admiring their strong advocacy efforts in Sacramento on behalf of not just seniors but everyone getting screwed by the system these days, I recently joined the Grey Panthers (ok, I lied and told 'em I was over 50).  Here's an article from their upcoming newsletter that's of interest to Hagsters... - DG
__________________________

The Elephant in the Corner....

The press, the airwaves and the internet are full of the very serious mortgage crisis and the rising tide of foreclosures. When it comes to getting keeping a home, the credit crunch is hitting Middle America hard.

But after proper attention goes to predatory lending practices, spiking monthly payments, foreclosures and loss of property, is anyone paying attention to our fellow Americans who don't earn enough to have a mortgage to foreclose?  That's the `elephant' in the room that no one wants to talk about!

The housing crisis goes beyond the battering of Middle America; blue collar America is getting stomped by sky-high rent increases and growing shortages of even remotely affordable apartments. The Center for Housing Policy (go to http://www.nhc.org) lays out the facts:

* The number of working family renters paying more than half of their income for housing has doubled (103%) since 1997.

* This is an even sharper increase than among working family homeowners, who showed a 75% increase.

* The Center for Housing Policy working family households as those with at least one full time job paying at the least minimum wage but no more than 120% of the local average (median) income.

* In all, the number of working families who paid more than half their income for housing and/or lived in severely dilapidated conditions rose from 3,000,000 in 1997 to 5,200,000 in 2005.

* The affordable housing crunch is a national problem, not limited-for instance-to well-known high cost areas such as New York, Boston and San Francisco. Large numbers of working people in places like Denver, Kansas City, Pittsburgh and Indianapolis are also paying more than half of their incomes for housing, and often that housing that is in bad repair and otherwise neglected.

Gray Panthers have always called for policies and programs to address these needs. Our voices have not been heard, particularly at the national level.

It is time try again-this time, it's not only seniors and the very poor who are hurting: more and more, the problem is engulfing the middle class, who are not used to being ignored. We can:

* Start the conversation about affordable housing in our home towns.  Local policies-zoning, redevelopment of rental units into condominiums, etc-affect the ability of teachers, nurses, firefighters, police, technicians, service employees and many other voters to find and keep homes for their families.  They have a reason to work for policies which protect their homes.  We can work together.

* Make sure that local government addresses the whole problem-it's not just the credit crunch.  Helping stressed home OWNERS is not enough; RENTERS must be at the table, too.

* Don't accept the untruth that "nothing can be done."  Point to communities which are grappling with this problem and succeeding.  If our current crop of officeholders can't do anything, find some who can and will.

* Get commitments from local officials to maintain the rental housing stock.  Don't allow condominium conversions unless the renters have somewhere to go in the same area.

* Don't stop with local government. Continue to besiege Congress and the White House and all State officials about affordable housing.  Displaced renters and housing-stressed families should not be the only ones who are unhappy about this situation.

* Enlist allies.  In some areas, communities of faith have taken on the affordable housing issue and have forced politicians to pay attention.  Unions, neighborhood associations and others also have a stake-moral and/or financial-in this fight.

* Be an ally.  Support those who are working for affordable housing by joining in their campaigns.

Peace,

Susan Murany
Executive Director
Gray Panthers

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

The Building's Green, But What About The Commute?

Here's excerpts from an article in Environmental Building News, which discusses how energy required to get workers from home to work often far surpasses that of the workplace itself.  So building affordable housing close to employment centers (i.e. in the SAP and  the area along Airport Boulevard) makes eminent sense environmentally.  - DG
___________________________________

"Designers and builders expend significant effort to ensure that our buildings use as little energy as possible. This is a good thing—and very obvious to anyone who has been involved with green building for any length of time. What is not so obvious is that many buildings are responsible for much more energy use getting people to and from those buildings. That's right—for an average office building in the United States, calculations done by Environmental Building News (EBN) show that commuting by office workers accounts for 30% more energy than the building itself uses. For an average new office building built to code, transportation accounts for more than twice as much energy use as building operation."

"'Transportation energy intensity' is a metric that has long been used to measure such things as how efficiently freight is transported. We're proposing it here as a metric of building performance. The transportation energy intensity of a building is the amount of energy associated with getting people to and from that building, whether they are commuters, shoppers, vendors, or homeowners. The transportation energy intensity of buildings has a lot to do with location. An urban office building that workers can reach by public transit or a hardware store in a dense town center will likely have a significantly lower transportation energy intensity than a suburban office park or a retail establishment in a suburban strip mall."

"In addition to these direct emissions from transportation, there are many other environmental impacts associated with the infrastructure needed to support transportation and with development patterns. Our roadways create impervious surfaces that result in significant pollutant runoff into waterways—in fact, non-point source water pollution from stormwater runoff is now the nation's leading source of water pollution to estuaries and the third largest to lakes. Highways fragment ecosystems and wildlife habitat. Paved areas, including roadways and parking lots, absorb solar energy, contributing to localized heat islands that exacerbate smog and increase air-conditioning requirements in urbanized areas. And stormwater runoff from these surfaces creates thermal pollution that makes many waterways unsuitable for trout and other cold-water fish."

Source: Environmental Building News, Sep 01, 2007

Monday, September 24, 2007

A Big Push for Affordable Housing

   
A decades-old proposal is getting a new lease on life.
              By Kent Garber  US News & World Report Saturday 22 September 2007
    For more than a decade, Georgia Johnson has watched the human exodus: the steady trickle outward of longtime friends who sold their homes to developers and to the newcomers who came amid the housing boom of the 1990s. 
    Now in her 70s, Johnson still lives in Lynwood Park, a historically black neighborhood on the north side of Atlanta. Her one-story bungalow dates from the 1940s, but the rest of the neighborhood now is characterized by pricey brick houses with two-car garages. A new subdivision with potted trees and manicured lawns boasts designer homes for $1 million plus. 
    But the old neighborhood hasn't bowed out quietly, and of its many efforts to preserve its affordability, one in particular underscores the renewed debate in Congress over how to fix or contain the country's expanding housing crisis. 
    It has supported a housing bill first proposed in 1987 and re-energized this fall that would create a national housing trust fund: a dedicated source of money to build affordable new houses and rehabilitate old ones. Unlike existing housing programs, which are subject to the whims of congressional appropriations, the trust fund would be politically immune. It would be financed, in part, by diverting revenue from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored mortgage giants. 
    Condos 
    Supporters of the trust fund say that it is a much-needed wedge against a troubling national motif: the destruction of affordable in-town housing, often at the hands of high-rise condominium and luxury home developers. (Chicago alone lost nearly 100,000 apartment units from 1989 to 2004, while gaining roughly an equal number of condos.) For the first time, the bill passed out of a House committee with significant bipartisan support, and it is expected to be introduced on the House floor this month. 
    Not since 1992 has Congress approved a major overhaul of housing laws. The renewed interest reflects not only the new Democratic leadership but also two unsettling trends: Housing costs are growing, and federal funding isn't. According to a study published by the Joint Center for Housing Studies, nearly 1 in 7 American households is "severely housing cost-burdened," spending more than half of its income on housing. 
    The other issue is that annual appropriations for federal housing programs have stalled, or decreased, since the 1990s, despite the swelling slice of Americans who qualify for assistance. Last year, annual federal spending on housing programs fell 2.3 percent thanks to inflation and defense priorities. 
    One model that proponents of the national trust fund hope to emulate is that of the local trust fund. In Washington, D.C., a tax-exempt trust fund has helped build and rehabilitate more than 5,000 units since 2001. Many of the recipients make less than $30,000 annually, compared with the city's mean household income of $94,500. Among the beneficiaries is Jeffrey Allen, 50, who lives in a complex called Freedom House. "I was at a shelter for six months and then on the streets before that," Allen says. "I don't know what I would have done without this place." 
    But as legislation goes, housing bills aren't sexy, and philosophical squabbles intervene. To many Republicans, "trust fund" equals "slush fund," and the Bush administration opposes the bill, claiming it would siphon money from existing programs. 
    It helps the effort that Democrats now control Congress. But the real push could be the public outcry over housing. With "subprime mortgages" and "predatory lending" now colloquial expressions, lawmakers on both sides are under pressure to assuage constituent concerns. "Certainly, the subprime mortgage crisis highlights the fact that low- to moderate-income folks are struggling to maintain or purchase a home," says West Virginia Rep. Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican who voted for the bill in committee. "I think the trust fund is part of an attempt to address that sort of overarching issue."




See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

AB1542 PASSES!

A bill sponsored by HAG and its allies - AB1542 - was all but given up for dead when the state Senate failed to approve it in a vote taken Friday, 9/7. The bill gives greater protections to mobilehome residents where the park owner wants to convert the park to condominiums, and was hotly opposed by the Realtors, the park owners association, and property rights groups (the "Prop 90 crowd").
But the bill's sponsors, Assemblymember Noreen Evans and Senator Ellen Corbett, refused to give up. With the help of hundreds of mobilehome park residents around the state who called their senators to urge a yes vote, and help from organizations like the Western Center, CRLA, CMRRA, CARA, the League of Cities (!), organized labor, and GSMOL, two more senators voted for the bill and it passed today 21-14.
But we're not there yet... the bill needs the Governor's signature to become law. He's got a couple weeks to decide whether to sign or veto it. We need to show the gov that thousands of mobilehome residents and housing advocates around the state want him to sign this bill. Please fax a letter to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger urging him to sign AB1542 into law. Here's the address and fax number:

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-445-2841
Fax: 916-445-4633

Special thanks go to Noreen Evans and Ellen Corbett and their staffs for really going the extra mile to get this important but controversial bill passed.

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

NIMBY Notebook: Habitat For Hypocrisy

From: Mother Jones, July-August, 2007
http:///

News: Housing advocates say Marin County's Bill Duane exemplifies a vexing irony: People support affordable housing with their labor, money, and votes--just so long as it's nowhere near them.

July 17, 2007

Bill Duane knows most people can't afford homes like his $1 million bungalow on a hill overlooking San Francisco Bay. That's why the Marin County attorney volunteered for Habitat for Humanity. Until recently, that is, when the group announced plans to build two affordable duplexes just down the street from him. "Habitat usually goes into a blighted neighborhood and enhances it," Duane says. "Here, they are coming into an enhanced neighborhood and blighting it." Housing advocates say Duane exemplifies a vexing irony: People support affordable housing with their labor, money, and votes--just so long as it's nowhere near them.

Standing beside his garden of coastal succulents, Duane, who looks like a cashmere-clad Rodney Dangerfield, spoke in nervous bursts. He fretted about a note that a retired schoolteacher had sent him inside a Monet greeting card, which began, "You are a disgrace to the human race and should be ashamed of yourself." His research revealed that the teacher's home is worth almost as much as his own. "And it's surrounded by vacant lots," he exclaimed, "so why don't you build it there?"

That, too, might be easier said than done: Marin is among the most liberal (and expensive) counties in the nation, but Duane says all of his neighbors back him. Indeed, opposition to affordable housing in the county was so fierce in the 1990s that a Marin chapter of Habitat disbanded, former members say, after finding itself unable to get a single project built in five years. On the opposite coast, in wealthy, liberal Martha's Vineyard, 10 homeowners sued earlier this year--on environmental grounds--to block construction of an affordable house for a fisherman who'd been living with his wife and children in a tent. In Boulder, Colorado, affordable-housing advocate Joni Lynch says her most strident foes were button-wearing progressives. And in the gentrifying Edgewood neighborhood of Washington, D.C., one resident who fought the construction of the low-income St. Martin's apartments nearby actually worked for a company that builds low-income apartments.

But few development projects have been more enigmatically unpopular than the Marin project, where three luxury houses will be clumped onto a 17.5-acre hill in a way that preserves most of the land as open space. In accordance with county rules, the developer set aside an acre for low-income housing. There, Habitat will build four units, two melded together to look like one Craftsman-style home, which will be sold at below-market rates to families making $40,000 to $56,000 a year (a teacher in Marin earns on average $47,000).

Duane and I climbed into his Mercedes station wagon and drove to the project site, a hillside of chaparral and grass. He'd promised me it would be obvious that congestion was already bad. A lone Toyota Prius with a "Save Tibet" sticker silently cruised by. "Usually this whole area is packed with cars," he insisted. And if I researched the matter, he hinted, I might learn that the endangered Tiburon mariposa lily grows here (naturalists doubt it), and that an Indian burial spear discovered nearby might have belonged to the county's namesake, Chief Marin (a Marin anthropologist says Duane is "reporting things that are not there"). Duane next raised an environmental justice concern: Placing the affordable housing in the shadow of million-dollar homes fosters "a slave kind of mentality."

He restarted his car and pulled up the slope of Eagle Rock Drive, past gardens of salvia, agave, and bird-of-paradise, pointing out houses already owned by minorities; as if making a point, he waved to an Asian man checking his mail. "It's a very diverse community here," he said.

Too diverse for some. Duane's neighbor, 83-year-old Edward Sotelo, who bought his $1 million property for $3,000 long before Marin real estate boomed, still laments the construction of the nearby Krueger Pines senior citizens' home. "The characters in those units are not the best kind of people," he said as he glanced in the direction of its parking lot, home to a late-model bmw and a Porsche. "People say some of them go down to the street and beg."

The multiplicity of neighborly concerns raised by nimbyists can leave housing advocates guessing what the real issue is. A recent poll by the Citizens Housing and Planning Association in Massachusetts suggests that, across party lines, most opposition to affordable housing boils down to homeowner fear of lowered property values and higher school costs.

At any rate, Duane believes that housing working-class people in high-income areas goes beyond Habitat's mandate. "There seems to be a change in the idea of what Habitat is," he says. "It reminds me of what's happened with the American Civil Liberties Union, which used to be a great institution in the '30s, '40s, and '50s. But now the aclu is saying, 'Well, we're going to represent the Mexicans and illegal aliens, rather than Americans.' They've overstepped." Duane would rather see a new group build visionary, ecofriendly communes in Marin where low-income people can share appliances such as refrigerators. "They should be creating wireless areas of tribal habitats," he says. Not in his neighborhood, though. He recommends a spot owned by the Catholic Church, several exits down the freeway.


Tuesday, August 21, 2007

HAG's Affordable Housing Strategies

Jurisdictions throughout northern California are beginning the process of updating their General Plan Housing Elements (due 7/1/09). The Housing Advocacy Group has a list of housing element programs which have been shown to be effective in generating affordable housing and housing for special needs populations such as seniors, farmworkers and persons with disabilities. Click Here to see the list. Please leave us a comment here or send us an e-mail (to hagster@gmail.com) if you have suggestions for changes or additions to this list.

Thursday, August 2, 2007

Sacramento lawsuit targets city homeless policy

From the 8/2/07 Sacramento Bee
By Denny Walsh - Bee Staff
The way the city of Sacramento and Sacramento County treat homeless people is unconstitutional, according to a lawsuit to be filed today in federal court.
Attorney Mark Merin is seeking to have his lawsuit certified as a class action on behalf of people living "without fixed nighttime shelter" -- as well as homeless people who have had personal property confiscated and destroyed.
Merin said the city and county have historically recognized that there aren't enough beds for the homeless, yet have failed to produce long-term remedies.
Merin said Wednesday he would like local government to follow the city of San Diego's example by imposing a moratorium on the arrest of homeless people, allowing them to sleep in public places between 9 p.m. and 6 a.m. Those arrangements were negotiated to settle a number of lawsuits, he said.
According to Merin's lawsuit, local ordinances prohibiting homeless people from sleeping outside violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because they punish people for being homeless.
It also claims the practice of taking and destroying personal property, "including necessary survival gear, as well as irreplaceable prescription medication, paperwork, memorabilia, valuables and tools," violates their rights.
The suit seeks an injunction barring the city and county from continuing policies and practices alleged to be unconstitutional. It also seeks damages of no less than $4,000 for each time a homeless person who qualifies as a class member was cited for sleeping outdoors or had personal property seized and destroyed.
Sacramento City Attorney Eileen Teichert said the city is "looking into these allegations."
"I'm surprised and shocked at them," Teichert said. "During my year and a half in this job, I've been very impressed by the humane outreach efforts to the homeless by the city. It is one of the few cities in the state that has an element in its housing plan for low and very low income people.
"This city is exemplary in its treatment of the homeless."
Sacramento County Counsel Bob Ryan, Sheriff John McGinness and Police Department spokesman Sgt. Matt Young declined to comment Wednesday.
Last year, a sweep of homeless camps in northern Sacramento County was preceded by posting of information about where the homeless could receive help if they were interested in getting off the streets.
Sheriff's officials said they were trying to do more than just move the homeless from one part of the community to the other.
During the winter, the county provides 140 beds at Cal Expo, as overflow from the 20-bed Volunteers of America Shelter on North A Street and the 32-bed Salvation Army women's shelter on North B Street.
Plaintiff Anthony Lehr, 49, said Wednesday that everything he owned was confiscated during a cold spell last winter when he was homeless.
Lehr said he was camping on the Sacramento River bank when authorities took his tent, flannel shirts, sleeping bag and food. "It was the basic things you needed to live," Lehr said.
Wednesday afternoon, Lehr brought Merin out on the levee to show him the spot where he often took refuge -- and where he lost his belongings.
The suit's plaintiffs are 11 individuals, who are representative of the homeless; Loaves & Fishes, a nonprofit organization that provides services to the homeless; Sacramento Homeless Organizing Committee, an unincorporated association of homeless and formerly homeless people; and Francis House, a nonprofit organization that provides counseling to the poor.
Besides the city and county, defendants include Sacramento Police Chief Albert Nájera and McGinness.
"The solution to homelessness is housing," Merin said in an interview. "It is not harassing homeless people until they go away. On any given night, there are about 1,000 people out on the street because the shelters are full. Many of them camp on the riverbanks, but they are regularly rousted by law enforcement."
"They are cited for camping illegally or possessing a shopping cart," Merin said. "They don't show up in court and a warrant is issued for failure to appear. They are arrested, processed through the jail and prosecuted. Then the cycle starts all over again."
"If the city and county spent a fraction of what this is costing to deal with the homeless in a humane and just manner," he said, "it would go a long way toward eliminating the problem."
In the early hours of Jan. 30, according to the suit, an official count of homeless people in the city and county totaled 2,452. Of this total, 709 were in emergency shelters, 738 in transitional shelters, and 1,005 -- including four children and 17 seniors -- were "sleeping in the streets." The number of unsheltered had increased nearly 10 percent since 2005, the suit says.
The county estimates that 11,000 people in the area will be homeless sometime during a calendar year, according to Merin.
Merin has had extraordinary success pursuing legal actions on behalf of jail inmates and juvenile wards subjected to strip searches in Sacramento County.
"Through this lawsuit, we hope we can develop a more enlightened policy rather than just sweep them under the rug," Merin said.
Basics such as secure storage for their belongings, strategically located portable toilets and Dumpsters where they can dispose of their trash would be a start, Merin said.
After he lost his belongings, Lehr sought help from Loaves & Fishes in rebuilding his inventory. He now is taking advantage of a federal housing program and works at Loaves & Fishes checking belongings into daily storage for homeless. They are allowed to leave their things for the day while they run errands, go to job interviews or go to court.
Lehr, who regularly stores clothing and court documents, understands the value of a safe harbor for their possessions.
"It's all they have," he said.
Merin said San Diego is not the only place where litigation has forced a change in the treatment of homeless persons. A federal judge in Fresno issued an injunction in December prohibiting that city from citing homeless for sleeping outdoors and seizing personal property without prior notice and storage of the property until the owner can recover it.
In a challenge to a Los Angeles ordinance, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year ruled that, as long as there are a greater number of homeless than beds for them, a city cannot keep the unsheltered from "sitting, lying or sleeping" on skid row sidewalks.